Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Detention of children ends but is the proposed alternative humane?

John O | 06.08.2010 08:02 | Migration | Repression | Workers' Movements | World

Families with all legal rights exhausted to be given two weeks to leave the UK voluntarily

If they don't

Children/parents will be forcibly removed from their homes and taken directly to the airport to board the plane.

UKBA will likely ask for a heavy police presence should the family try and build up any form of community protest on the day of removal. UKBA concerned that if they fail to remove family on the day,  significant public order problems may occur at any future attempts.

In the event of parents of family resisting on the day, family could be separated, children possibly taken into care, whilst police/immigration officials deal with parents.

Any last minute legal challenges processed through the legal system expediently.

The document at many points, stresses the strength of community resistance, from people in the street, teachers, NGOs, MPs, voluntary groups, faith groups, charitable organisations and the media

( The briefing paper reprinted below has been leaked to the media)

Briefing paper

Title: Alternatives to Detention for Asylum Seeking Families, Subject to Removal

From: Nicola Rea - Head of Service Asylum, Refugee & Migration Services Date: 27th June 2010

1. Background

1 .1 The United Kingdom Border Agency (UKBA) have used detention centres as places to accommodate families who are waiting to be removed from the country for many years. This has resulted in political debates on the moral rights and wrongs of whether children should be accommodated in detention.

1.2 In the Coalition Agreement, Section 17, Immigration, there was a commitment from the Coalition Government:  "We will end the detention of children for immigration purposes"

1.3 Damian Green, the Immigration Minister, has therefore requested a review. This started on the 15th June, to run for six weeks. As part of the review, UKBA are undertaking two pilots looking at alternative ways of removing families from the country without using detention. These pilots are in London and the North West. UKBA are under pressure from the Minister to start these pilots immediately so that they can feed into the review findings.

2. The Proposed North West Pilot

2.1 The idealised process of the proposed pilot is as follows:

* The main applicant of the family, who are appeals rights exhausted, is asked to visit Reliance House in Liverpool to be informed by UKBA that they are part of the pilot.

* The family is given 2 weeks to leave the country voluntarily.

* The family is then visited by UKBA and served with removal directions. They are informed that they will be removed at some point in the next two weeks. It is still undecided in the process whether a specific date and time will be given, or a longer period of a couple of days, in which they have to remain in the property ready.

* The family are removed from the property and taken to the airport to board the plane.

* During the month period, any last minute legal challenges will be dealt with, and any immunisations will be administered.

2.2 UKBA have provided the names and addresses of the families selected for the pilot and have commenced liaison with them. The LA's in which the families live have been made aware of who the families are.

3. Issues for Public Services

3.1 There are many potential issues for all public services. For the purposes of ease of reading, these have been split into services areas that the pilot will affect most. Each of these areas are being analysed in order to minimise the risk to the service.

4 Police

4.1 Increased police presence may be required should the family try and build up a form of community protest on the day of removal. UKBA are currently making policy decisions as to what they will do should this scenario occur.

4.2 If UKBA choose not to remove the family - then protests will become a common occurrence. If they continue with the removal of the family then this could lead to significant public order problems.

4.3 The alternative is to not inform the family of the exact time and date of removal, so that they are not prepared. However, this has its own difficulties which would need analysing and addressing.

5. Health

5.1 Some families will require immunisation prior to returning to their country of origin. Health services will be required to administer such immunisations within a specified timescale ensuring the family are fit to travel.

5.2 Some families who have specific health needs may require specific support in being taken to the airport, boarding the plane, during the flight and onwards at the other end. Health service may be required to ensure that suitable support is put in place.

5.3 Some families may have members who suffer from long-term illnesses or have significant health issues. If they decide to abscond, rather than be returned, health providers will face difficulties in providing continuing treatment. There may also be associated public health concerns if such conditions remain untreated.

6. Schools

6.1 In the period between the family being informed they are being returned, and the removal, any children will continue to attend school. These children will possibly have increased distressed levels. They may also talk to other children in the school about having to return to their country of origin. This could cause additional pressures in the classroom environment.

6.2 Occasionally teachers become involved in campaigns to stop families being removed. There is an increased potential for families to ask the teachers and schools for support in this process.

7. The Media & The Third Sector

7.1 Families will continue to live in the community, whilst being fully aware that they are to be removed. It is likely that they will use all means at their disposal to try and avoid being removed. The use of media campaigns is common where similar circumstances have arisen previously and should be expected. Furthermore, lobbying from voluntary groups, churches and charitable organisations is common and can also be expected.

8. Legal

8.1 Families will need to discuss their impending removal with their legal representatives as quickly as possible. It is likely that last minute legal challenges such as judicial reviews will be submitted. These will need to be processed through the legal system expediently.

9. Politicians

9.1 Often the support of MPs and Local Elected Members is requested in a bid to add political weight to any campaign to reverse UKBAs decision. This scenario is likely to continue to occur. MPs and Elected Members will also have concerns over any community cohesion issues within their constituency/ward.

10. Housing Providers

10.1 Service users are likely to display increased distress at their situation.

The stress and anxiety may express itself in more extreme manners and behavioural patterns. Staff visiting the families in their accommodation will be required to deal with such situations.

11. Emergency Services

11 .1 The way in which people react to the knowledge of removal is different for everyone. Some service users may act in a more extreme manner in order to delay removal. This could result in the usage of emergency services, and other services to look after the children whilst the parent is being cared for.

12. Children Services

12.1 Families react in different ways when knowing they are going to be removed. There is the potential for several different scenarios:

* The family accepts removal and is waiting

* The family absconds from the property, resulting in safeguarding concerns for the LA.

* The parents abscond from the property, and the Local Authority has to take the children into care

* There are children missing from the property when the family is meant to be removed.

Some of the above scenarios will have significant resource and safeguarding implications.

13. After Removal Date

13.1 It is common for there to be last minute difficulties with paperwork etc and the family can not be removed on the specified date. It is unknown at the moment what will happen / what support will continue to be provided to the family should this scenario arise.

13.2 It is not an unusual occurrence for there to be last minute issues with families at the airport getting on the plane to their country of origin. It might be that a member of the family needs last minute medical care, and a later plane booking. This could be at any airport in the country, although it is normally Heathrow. A decision needs to be made by UKBA as to what will happen to the family in this circumstance. There are both practical and strategic issues that will need to be addressed if the family are expected to return to the property if the plane is not boarded.

14. Recommendations

14.1 It is important that the pilot delivers an accurate assessment of how families react to the removal processes under examination. All agencies, including local authorities and the voluntary sector, are therefore encouraged to co-operate fully with it.

Nicola Rea

Head of Service - Asylum, Refugee & Migration Service 27th June 2010

End of Bulletin:

Source for this Message:
Freemovement

John O
- e-mail: JohnO@freemovement.org.uk
- Homepage: http://www.freemovement.org.uk

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech