6 days? take screen shots and stick them on here mate. Get others to do the same on blogs and other open publishing sites.

good luck

This has the rank and pestilent odour of Freemasons all over it.

 http://tim-haynes.co.uk/letter.html

It appears to be a copy of a love letter from Tim Haynes to this guy's wife.

Sounds like this Ian guy has been shit-stirring about the Tim guy who had an affair with his wife (understandably) and someone in a high place is very pally with the City filth.

Cops are usually pretty nasty, but I most admit the City ones are particularly scummy.

"Sarah mayo has stated in a recorded interview that if you say print or publish anything, even if it is completely true, if it causes hurt feelings then a crime has been committed."

The woman is talking out her arse.

If you print or publish a story that can be verified as being true and somebody takes offence or claims a grievance, they have the option to seek redress before the courts and will be required to prove that the story is false.

If it isn't false, the claim fails and the story stands.

In every single case, it is a civil matter and the police have no jurisdiction to involve themselves.

In this case, the police are defaulting to usual form, attempting to inject themselves into a civil matter by fabricating a criminal offence. They are always doing this.

It is the reason the so-called "authority" of the police is rejected by so many these days.

By the way, is this the same Kroll associates that were implicated in the death of IT specialist Richard Chang who "fell from a window of the Abbey National bank to his death" while being interviewed by Kroll "operatives"?

They certainly do deserve the reputation of being the Wall Street's CIA.

Under English law, truth is a valid defence against a libel accusation, with a few exceptions:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law#Justification

Interestingly, one exception is if the statement concerns spent convictions. So does that mean if a website has an old news report of someone being convicted of an offence, they have to take it down when the conviction is spent? With the internet, anything put into the public domain is essentially kept forever, so convictions are never really spent in practice.

Subject: Fwd: Interview with investigative journalist Mr E xxxxxxxxxxxx*
*please note the news paper and journalists have conditionally asked me not to name them until after the trial for legal reasons 
 


You have made a 17 minute film about the unusual background of your case, why?

Actually it's 22minutes at the moment, but the exe producer wants it cut to 17mins (believe it or not, it's being edited in Panama). I have received a significant amount of interest from the press, celebrities and even the media from as far away as Australia. The background of the case is simple, however it's complexity comes from the people involved and the relationships and private discussions between them. It's only when you see & hear what has been said by for example of the president of a global company to the management of private security company and then see how those messages are then interpreted by senior police officers...the story comes alive.
As a Sunday times journalist said, it's a unbelievable tale of; Greed, sex in the board room and a north London plumber. It's a public interest story as it exposes corruption at the highest levels in the city of London between global companies and there own private police force.

Your film includes secret documents, unofficial recorded interviews and questionable interviews between some very high ranking people, are you worried about being sued and the legality of how the documents may have been obtained?

Not really, the people behind all this nonsense and I am not referring to the chap bringing the charge against me are extremely powerful, however they have forced me into a corner that I will get out of, if by telling the truth and exposing there corrupt practices (which unfortunately embarrasses them), then so be it. They can't try and crush me, trash my name, threaten & abuse (we will name names & show the these cowards) and then when I complain about it, they get upset!
When they broke into my home and stole all my court defence paper work they crossed the line. They wanted my defence paper work and most importantly the new video, waiting on
     legal advice as to when it can be safely placed in the public domain.
When I went to the spectator, I was advised to make copies of everything as these people "will break in to your home for it", to be honest it sounded like something out of a spy novel, however they were right, I'm just really pleased they didn't get the new video as this is pwhat they wanted most.
If they want to sue me they can, however if what I say is true and I can prove it, it will be an interesting court case ( and fun). I have little too lose,  the veneer of respectability that these people operate behind will be truly removed. As for the evidence I was given/obtained, this obviously is secret.


You have engaged the services of the renowned QC, Michael Wolkind. What does he say about your case and your new video?

The video is on its final edit as we are adding an update on the break in and also a very faint but  audible telephone conversation.......let's say the viewer can make up his/her mind about whose behind it.
Michaels council is privileged so, no comment.

How has this whole issue affected your personal and working life?

It has, you will have to wait until the court hearing to find out.

What did Andrew Neil and Andrew Gilligan say when you met them?

You will have to wait until we go to court ( they were very nice though)

You have been charged with creating a threatening and harassing video blog, will you be arrested again for your new blog?

We will have to wait and see, the 'other person that is bringing the charge against me is not named in the new video' as it has nothing to do with him, there is reference to him but only in the context to provide the background as to why we are in the current situation and the big organisations working on this in the background.

How do the City of London Counter Terrorism & Major Investigations Directorate feature in the new documentary ?

Wait and see :-)

Who is the most interesting person you have met during your involvement in this case ?

May I name several, David Shayler the ex mi5 officer, democracy & freedom guru Ray StClair, PM & MP's and banksy. People from all over the globe have been very kind and supportive, I would like to thank them and just say, stand up for what you believe in, it's not something us Brits are inclined naturally always do.