Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

In Defence of the Royal Wedding

Cautiously Pessimistic | 31.01.2011 17:41 | Public sector cuts | Social Struggles

Well, not quite, but I do think the calls that have gone out to disrupt the wedding need to be seriously thought through.

I’d been meaning to write something about this for a few days now, but now that the Sun’s suddenly discovered the anarchist plot against the Royal Wedding (an article which has already been demolished by Rob Ray here), now seems like a good time to take the subject up. Calls to disrupt the wedding have been coming from sources as different as Ian Bone, Laurie Penny and Phil Dickens for a while now. However, at the risk of outing myself as a spineless liberal opportunist, I really don’t see what we’d gain from it. This isn’t talking about the threat of strikes by rail workers on the day, which I think makes perfect sense, but that’s not an act directed against the wedding so much as an act exploiting the wedding in order to put maximum pressure on their employers. That makes sense to me, but most of us won’t be in that position – when you’ve been given the day off work anyway, not coming in is hardly a radical act. My argument in this article should also not be read as a criticism of the protesters who attacked Charles and Camilla – that was making good use of an opportunity that spontaneously fell into their lap, no-one had spent any time organising or building for that moment, and so it can hardly be called a waste of time and resources.
I understand, and completely agree with, the argument that says that the wedding is an irrelevant distraction from the real economic issues that we face. I don’t understand why that means we should focus our own attention on it rather than concentrating on the real issues, though. That sounds too much like the Trot logic that says that parliamentary elections are a meaningless charade, so we should stand our own candidates in order to expose them, instead of just refusing to participate in the whole shitty circus at all. When Phil Dickens says that “if we would pause a struggle against the ruling class out of deference to the distraction they have created, they have no reason to take us seriously”, he makes a valid point, but I think there’s a big difference between refusing to pay deference to a distraction and actively directing your attention towards the distraction, which is what calls to blockade the wedding ultimately come to. Not only is it a waste of time, I think the class politics of anti-monarchy events are actually less clear-cut than those of anti-cuts campaigns. On its own, getting rid of the monarchy wouldn’t end class society, and it wouldn’t even severely damage the ruling class – it’d just bring us into line with other liberal democratic republics, like the United States and France. Excuse me if I don’t find the prospect that exciting.
I’d just like to ask: what do we have to lose, and what do we have to gain? On the negative side, I’m sure there are a good number of workers who’re vaguely aware of their economic interests, and not enthusiastic about the cuts, who still have some sentimental attachment to the royals, or who, at the very least, don’t particularly give a shit about the royals but have a healthy respect for anything that gives them a day off work, and find the idea of disrupting a couple’s wedding day (and protesting against the event that gives them a day off work) to be mean-spirited and offputting. We will upset and alienate these people, many of whom might otherwise be won to our side. Of course, this argument could be levelled against any effective (i.e. disruptive) action, so we should weigh it against what we have to gain. Which is, um… well, what exactly? Are we hoping that we’ll be disruptive enough that we can physically stop the wedding from happening, and perhaps bring down the monarchy altogether? Because that’s not going to happen. Are we hoping that our actions will in some way decrease support for the monarchy and increase the popularity of the anti-cuts movement? Again, how exactly do people think that’ll happen?
If people are determined to hold anti-wedding events, I’d suggest that it’d make sense to try and organise events that cannot be interpreted as just the actions of mean-spirited killjoys. Instead of trying to fuck up someone else’s party, I think it’d make more sense to just use the day off to organise alternative celebrations of community solidarity. That might not be as exciting or dramatic as talking a load of sinister-sounding bollocks to tabloid journalists, but it’s also a lot more likely to actually have some appeal to people who aren’t already hardened revolutionaries. I am not a fan of the institution of marriage, and I don’t think it’s a choice I’d ever want to make for myself, but if there are any radically-minded couples in your area thinking of getting married/making a similar symbolic commitment around that time, you could hold a celebration of their relationship (provided that they’re up for it, of course), as a way of pointing out that a) it’s fucking absurd to hold a big public event celebrating a relationship between two people – but if the Royals get that treatment, why not the rest of us? and b) those two people have probably achieved more worthwhile stuff in their entire lives than Wills & Kate ever will.
Bottom line: if the Sun and Chris Knight are both getting really excited about something, you can pretty much guarantee that it’s a shit idea.

Articles referenced, in order:  http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3380637/Anarchists-target-Prince-William-and-Kate-Middleton-royal-wedding.html
 http://libcom.org/blog/anarchists-right-royal-plot-31012011
 http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/laurie-penny/2011/01/wedding-government-public
 http://truth-reason-liberty.blogspot.com/2011/01/economic-blockades-and-royal-wedding.html
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8250676/Royal-Wedding-tube-strike-threat.html
Entire piece lifted from:  http://nothingiseverlost.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/in-defence-of-the-royal-wedding/

Cautiously Pessimistic
- Homepage: http://nothingiseverlost.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/in-defence-of-the-royal-wedding/

Comments

Display the following 7 comments

  1. Good one — Hugo de Pomfret III
  2. to the streets — A N Other
  3. @to the streets — Wes Da Monie
  4. Leaflets and communication — Camilla
  5. But how? — CP
  6. cheer up — jedward
  7. please do — anon
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech