The White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed among Jews Christians and Atheists – how can one tell the difference?

Zahir Ebrahim | Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

Saturday, February 19, 2011 | Last Updated February 20, 2011

[ For full features of this article see  http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/02/white-mans-burden-uniformly-distributed.html ]


This is part7 of my confusion series on trying to think for myself. It is a bloody confusing exercise which I wouldn't wish to inflict even upon my most despicable enemies – they already think plenty for themselves. See earlier episodes here: part1, part2, part3, part4, part5, and part6. This is the final episode as I have promised myself to no longer be plagued by this curse of independent thought. The comfort of following the experts, the know-it-all “illumined ones” from the vast spectrum of leaders offered to the plebes, is much more opiatic, if not completely soothing to the soul. A dead intellect is the best one for the sheep – and of course, the shepherds delight.

I begin by reproducing the famous 1899 poem, The White man's Burden, by Rudyard Kipling. Its full title in syncopation with the actual white man's burden of the time, actually was: “The White Man’s Burden: The United States and The Philippine Islands”. And it went like this:

Take up the White Man's burden--
Send forth the best ye breed--
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives' need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild--
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.

Take up the White Man's burden--
In patience to abide,
To veil the threat of terror
And check the show of pride;
By open speech and simple,
An hundred times made plain
To seek another's profit,
And work another's gain.

Take up the White Man's burden--
The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.

Take up the White Man's burden--
No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper--
The tale of common things.
The ports ye shall not enter,
The roads ye shall not tread,
Go mark them with your living,
And mark them with your dead.

Take up the White Man's burden--
And reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard--
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:--
"Why brought he us from bondage,
Our loved Egyptian night?"

Take up the White Man's burden--
Ye dare not stoop to less--
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloke your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your gods and you.

Take up the White Man's burden--
Have done with childish days--
The lightly proferred laurel,
The easy, ungrudged praise.
Comes now, to search your manhood
Through all the thankless years
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,
The judgment of your peers! --- Source

According to History Matters' commentary on the poem:

'In February 1899, British novelist and poet Rudyard Kipling wrote a poem entitled “The White Man’s Burden: The United States and The Philippine Islands.” In this poem, Kipling urged the U.S. to take up the “burden” of empire, as had Britain and other European nations. Published in the February, 1899 issue of McClure’s Magazine, the poem coincided with the beginning of the Philippine-American War and U.S. Senate ratification of the treaty that placed Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba, and the Philippines under American control. Theodore Roosevelt, soon to become vice-president and then president, copied the poem and sent it to his friend, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, commenting that it was “rather poor poetry, but good sense from the expansion point of view.” Not everyone was as favorably impressed as Roosevelt. The racialized notion of the “White Man’s burden” became a euphemism for imperialism, and many anti-imperialists couched their opposition in reaction to the phrase.' --- Source

Because history matters so much – both for understanding the present for the thought bearing, and for confounding the present for the uninitiated in order to get them 'United We Stand', not to mention for forging the future, any future, both good and bad – that Zbigniew Brzezinski had so astutely observed in The Grand Chessboard in 1996:

“The earlier empires were built by aristocratic political elites and were in most cases ruled by essentially authoritarian or absolutist regimes. The bulk of the populations of the imperial states were either politically indifferent, ... or infected by imperialist emotions ...a quest for national glory, 'the white man's burden', 'la mission civilisatrice', not to speak of the opportunities for personal profit – all served to mobilize support for imperial adventures to sustain essentially hierarchical imperial power pyramids. The attitude of American public toward the external projection of American power has been more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in WWII largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. .... After the Cold War had ended, the emergence of the United States as the single global power did not evoke much public gloating but rather elicited an inclination toward more limited definitions of American responsibilities abroad. Public opinion polls conducted in 1995 – 1996 indicated a general public preference for 'sharing' power with others, rather than for its monopolistic exercise.” (24,25)

“It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.” (35,36)

“Public opinion polls suggest that only a small minority (13 percent) of Americans favor the proposition that 'as the sole remaining superpower, the US should continue to be the preeminent world leader in solving international problems'. ... Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat. .... More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification. ... Mass communications have been playing a particularly important role in that regard, generating a strong revulsion against any selective use of force that entails even low levels of casualties .... In brief, the U.S. Policy goals must be un-apologetically twofold: to perpetuate America's own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer,...” (211-215)

So, how to embark on “imperial mobilization” when the American white man (and the Western white man in general) are no longer themselves “infected by imperialist emotions ...a quest for national glory, 'the white man's burden', 'la mission civilisatrice',” kept engaged, and ensnared, as they all are, in chasing their respective 'American Dreams'? Which, for the vast majority of 'white trash' among them, have their dollars, pounds, and euros, sucked out of their pockets even before it can reach their dinner tables and their perpetual debt collectors? The political science principle of achieving “imperial mobilization” under such conditions is to engineer consent – just as one might engineer technology, or engineer the voyage to the moon. It takes a great deal of expertise, and very deep pockets. This social technology is examined in the Preamble of my 2008 report Weapons of Mass Deception, where it is explained how consent, as well as dissent, both must to be manufactured in order to be effective, employing different categories of deceptions tailored to the different audiences and their mental acumen.

This variance of having a differing audience, also necessitates making the manufacturing process, and its products, different at every level. From simple big lies for the vast majority, to complex layered ones which mix verifiable empirical truths, half-truths, and outright lies characterized by clever omissions, layer by layer, so that the remaining few, as well as institutions and organizations with group-think, can also find something believable to suit their own individual propensities. Myths and mantras are cleverly fabricated and presented to each audience according to their own limited world views and selfish priorities which are often shared with their respective political, social, cultural, and religious groups. These engineered myths and mantras always motivate people to act in accordance with those implanted beliefs. The end result being that the history's actors are able to get away Machiavellianly sowing their irreversible faits accomplis amidst all the confusions which follow.

Different and often opposing myths also naturally seed the interesting Technique of Infamy among antagonist domestic groups, keeping people and cabals fully embroiled in vehemently debating who is right, who knows more, who is more intelligent, who is more pious, who is more peaceable, who is the avantgarde in thought and who are the sheep, etc. Such opposing “truths” deftly implanted among groups automatically enables setting one group against another – political philosopher Hegel's recipe for creating new order from old by orchestrating the continuous clash of the opposites known as Hegelian Dialectic – and we see this false Left--Right political paradigm orchestrated along those very lines, with almost an infinite layers in between, for that very purpose. And in the limit, internationally, it enables seeding total wars among nations – the key Machiavellian modus operandi for tearing down any old world order to create a new world order. Very powerful stuff. Such confabulations, hegelian mind-fcks I call them, were examined in depth in my essay on the Mighty Wurlitzer and the power of crafting enabling myths: Wikileaks and Imperial Mobilization.

My essay Unlayering the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities demonstrated that Brzezinski's prima facie motivation for inflicting American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives upon the world as expressed in The Grand Chessboard, which was chauvinistically stated as: “to perpetuate America's own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer,” was itself only a motivating myth. It was necessary for motivating America's vast military-industrial complex and the Pentagon warriors who all thrive on even small wars, and therefore would just love the idea of thriving endlessly in a Total War waged endlessly, the World War IV that will last “at least a generation and preferably longer,”.

The nihilistic notion of Total War similarly pushed by Brzezinski's confrere, Michael Ledeen, ostensibly to usher in regime changes throughout the New Middle East, is similarly absurd when one pauses to reflect that the old Middle East – ripe with installed dictators and implanted kingdoms oppressing their own peoples in service to the sole superpower along artificially contrived borders carved out from the remnants of the Ottoman empire at the conclusion of World War I – is entirely the orchestration of the same imperial masters now advocating the next cycle of regime changes:

“No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq… this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war… our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” -- Michael Ledeen, speaking at the AEI (American Enterprise Institute), 10/29/2001, source

Why is Ledeen selling Total War? For the same covert motivation Zbigniew Brzezinski is selling America's preeminence in The Grand Chessboard. Everyone in the military-industrial complex is sold what they want to hear. But the real intent behind the chauvinism, as empiricism testifies, is to bankrupt America, to demoralize its public, while sowing chaos and destruction in the previous world order they had themselves established after the two World Wars. Disguised in polished vernacular and under the farcical pretext of regime changes, is the nihilism to seed chaos and demoralization among the public throughout the world. This is even apparent when one un-layers Michael Ledeen even with an ounce of forensic thinking, especially in the light of empiricism:

“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.” -- Michael A. Ledeen, The War Against The Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. Wow We'll Win, 2003, pgs. 212-213

This is textbook Hegel. One can see this nihilistic theme being repeated over and over again, only the latest incarnation being the Egypt Revolution. This was examined in my article: Egypt and Tunisia – The 'arc of crisis' being radicalized!.

The agenda behind constructing all these “revolutionary times” along Zbigniew Brzezinski's “arc of crisis” using Michael Ladeen's “total war” for “creative destruction” wherein, the children of the white man, in Ladeen's own words: “our children will sing great songs about us years from now”, is to make the final push for the globalists' one-world government. The white man has very clearly understood that which most 'untermenschen' have not, in David Ben Gurion's own words: “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”!

To launch this renewed white man's burden for world government, entirely through deception, many many ruses, and many many peoples, from mercenaries to patsies, from manufactured ideologues to fabricated stooges, and from all walks of life and profession have been engaged.

Infiltrations are at every level, from physical to cognitive as per the old COINTELPRO style, and even at the level of the sub-conscious mind through both flag-waiving indoctrinations, and propaganda techniques pioneered by Edward Bernays. The latter had been successfully utilized by him to wage psy-op wars upon the peoples of all nations throughout World War I and World War II. Now refined to the level of science, this art of persuasion has been taken to new heights.

So, we have the Zionist Jews murdering the Palestinians to the sound of their trumpet while urging the superpower to wage endless war upon the world – the so called neo-cons. Then we have the American and its Allied Christian soldiers murdering the Iraqis, Afghanis, and Pakistanis, in large numbers, and again to the sound of even greater trumpets. Today, the blame for this Total War is entirely laid at the doorstep of the Jewish neo-cons who have visibly taken over almost all of the United States Government which is evidently being run from Tel Aviv.

But, is this mission of Total War through Total Deception hell of a lot different from the white man's burden of the not too distant past, when plain folks, quite genuinely “infected by imperialist emotions ...a quest for national glory, 'the white man's burden', 'la mission civilisatrice', not to speak of the opportunities for personal profit – all served to mobilize support for imperial adventures to sustain essentially hierarchical imperial power pyramids.”?

The settlement of the Americas by genociding its native inhabitants, is the best example of genocide of the indigenous peoples as the noble Christian white man's burden. The conquest of the sea trade routes by the East India Company and the physical colonization of the Indian subcontinent, is the best example of colonizing an indigenous peoples into subservient bondage to the noble Christian white man's la mission civilisatrice. The unfortunate native populations of the Americas, Australia, etc., weren't so fortunate, as the noble Bible thumping white man actually coveted their land. In India they only coveted her vast riches – the Jewel in their crown!

Well, that same exercise with only minor syntactic sugaring, is being inflicted by the holy Jews and noble atheistic soldiers of irredentist Zion upon the 'untermenschen' of Palestine today. Is it much different? Not according to the two Christian and Jewish statesmen, respective leaders of their nations. On the festive and felicitous occasion of the 60th anniversary of Israel's existence which was celebrated with much fanfare from Tel Aviv to Washington D.C., President George W. Bush along with his notable wife landed at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport on May 14, 2008, to the warm greetings of Shimon Perez:

“Welcome to the new Israel: Three thousand years old, and going on sixty”

President Bush had effusively replied:

“Our two nations both faced great challenges when they were founded. And our two nations have both relied on the same principles to help us succeed. We built strong democracies to protect the freedoms given to us by an Almighty God”

And the late Tanya Reinhart, the Leftist Jew and respected dissent chief of many a rebel, made the exact same comparison after she experienced her metanoia and tried to explain to the world the indoctrination and false justifications she was infected with while growing up as a Zionist in Israel:

“The state of Israel founded in 1948 following a war which the Israelis call the War of Independence, and the Palestinians call the Nakba – the catastrophe. A haunted, persecuted people sought to find a shelter and a state for itself, and did so at a horrible price to another people. During the war of 1948, more than half of the Palestinian population at the time – 1,380,000 people – were driven off their homeland by the Israeli army. Though Israel officially claimed that a majority of refugees fled and were not expelled, it still refused to allow them to return, as a UN resolution demanded shortly after 1948 war. Thus, the Israeli land was obtained through ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants. This is not a process unfamiliar in history. Israel's actions remain incomparable to the massive ethnic cleansing of Native Americans by the settlers and government of the United states. Had Israel stopped there, in 1948, I could probably live with it. As an Israeli, I grew up believing that this primal sin our state was founded on may be forgiven one day, because the founder's generation was driven by the faith that this was the only way to save the Jewish people from the danger of another holocaust.” -- Tanya Reinhart, Israel/Palestine – How to End the War of 1948, source

An honest comparison which evidently learned rebels like Alan Hart, another favorite rebel of the dissent space, who keep comparing the Zionist enterprise in Palestine to the Nazis, fail to make. I examined this inexplicable failure in response to Alan Hart's characterization of Israel as “The New Nazis”, in No, No - Not the 'New Nazis', January 2009.

Therefore, concluding the preceding analysis, I have to wonder how comes the brilliant white man is suddenly so naive that he fails to see the parallel white man's burdens in all his holier than thou blanket Jew bashing? I hope I may be forgiven today, in 2011, that I am entirely unable to differentiate one white man's burden from another. Can you tell them apart in the images below? Please click on the image and it will take you to a more detailed exposition in case you feel you are able tell the difference:

Hidden no longer: Genocide in the Americas by the pious Christians bearing the gift of the white man's burden to the native Indian tribes hiddennolonger.com
Caption Hidden no longer: Genocide in the Americas by the pious Christians bearing the gift of the white man's burden to the native Indian tribes hiddennolonger.com

Genesis to Genocide in Palestine by the pious Jews bearing the gift of the white man's burden to the Arabs and Muslims
Caption Genesis to Genocide in Palestine by the pious Jews bearing the gift of the white man's burden to the Arabs and Muslims

Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the war on terror, to Pakistan with copious help from the Pakistani House Negroes
Caption Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the war on terror, to Pakistan with copious help from the Pakistani House Negroes

Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the war on terror, to Afghanistan
Caption Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the war on terror, to Afghanistan

Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the war on terror, to Iraq
Caption Exodus, destruction, death and chaos, inflicted by the pious bearing gifts of Western civilization's new white man's burden, the war on terror, to Iraq

US troops urged to share faith in Afghanistan - 04 May 09
Caption Jesus has come in May to Afghanistan: US troops urged to share faith in Afghanistan - 04 May 09

US Soldiers in Afghanistan Told to 'hunt people for Jesus... so weget them into the kingdom' cached from  http://a4.vox.com/6a00cd9721fedb4cd500e398c39d740002-500pi
Caption US Soldiers in Afghanistan Told to “hunt people for Jesus... so we get them into the kingdom” rebelreports

The foolish 'untermenschen' better understand the insidious breadth and depth of the common la mission civilisatrice bond among the white man when they come, individually, and in groups, wearing different colored labels of Left, Right, Liberal, Conservative, Progressive, Atheist, Christian, Jew, whatever, bearing gifts of pious virtue in various Hegelian Dialects. Zbigniew Brzezinski justified the primacy of the powerful with “Hegemony is as old as mankind” in The Grand Chessboard only as the latter day secular version of that same white man's burden.

When I recently, only this past week in fact, once again challenged the pious white man's characteristic narratives in their blanket Jew bashing screeds in my letter: Zahir Ebrahim's Letter to John Kaminski – Are you Jewish?, and deconstructed the new white man's burden of Secular Humanism they now wish to inflict upon humanity in the guise of discrediting all established religions in order to secure their one-world government, I was not surprised by what happened. You can read the response of the fanatic all-knowing Jew-basher, who has extended his unfettered Jew bashing to both Christian and Muslim bashing: “Christians and Muslims are trapped in the same delusional mindlock as the Jews,” reviling without any compunction more than 5 billion peoples on the planet in just one sentence, even calling my religion, Islam, “fetid and toxic dogma”.

The supposedly rebel website which goes by that very name and presents itself on the side of the 'untermensch' by publishing dissenting articles with empire, gratuitously wrote an amusing editorial response to my letter instead of condemning their own favorite white man whose trite screed they boldly feature on their front page every week as the avantgarde in progressive thought: Rebel News' Letter to Zahir Ebrahim – Are you Mossad?. When I submitted my response to the white man denigrating my religion and 5 billion peoples' on the planet in the name of dissent and requested the website publish my response, the same editor wrote back: “I won't. Your writings clearly don't fit in. Thank you for your time. -- Andrew Winkler Rebel Media Group”!

Indeed!

This plebeian's antidote to hectoring hegemons clearly won't fit in where the white man's burden is the real agenda – heeheehee!

I have been labeled worse than “Mossad” for calling the bullshit of the white man. The 'denier' label from Israel Shamir, the holy Jew miraculously metanoia'd into pious Christian like the historical Saul into Paul, was a tad more cognitive.

But as of this writing, nothing has surpassed what the genuinely Christian rebel leader extraordinaire, Paul Craig Roberts, United States Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury who sat at the same oligarchic tables before taking on his new role, and who writes for the camouflaged white supremacist website VDARE.com, honored me with in Dec 06, 2008: “you are a completely stupid fool, a disgrace to humanity”. My unpardonable sin? Boldly calling his bullshit of maligning the Muslims as terrorists, while all the rest of fools, mostly the white man, applaud him for his gallant dissent!

Dissent with what? Dissent does not automatically imply being on the side of the 'untermenschen'. It is only presumed to be so in the vernacular which has calculatingly been developed in the West as a neuro linguistic programming Trojan Horse for the mind to alias subversion under association with something familiar. And this works great for pushing covert agendas of the elites themselves in a far more sophisticated format than merely through “controlled dissent” used for craftily channeling public opposition towards inefficacy. Dissent of the chiefs and many a public figure evidently also spans the gamut – and perhaps my cynicism may be forgiven as one of only a confused person endeavoring to think for oneself without the benefit of prominent “experts” to guide one – from disagreeing amongst each other while sharing the white man's burden, to herding the sheep of dissent to the same pastures as the sheep of mainstream but in round-about erudite ways. See: Responsibility of Intellectuals – Redux.

The pious white man is slipping today. Those majoring in Western hypocrisy might wish to work at layering their common mission civilisatrice with a bit more finesse and diabolicalism than they are doing now. Perhaps as they used to do in the past, when the East India Company created its version of globalism with free trade inflicted upon its colonies. And perhaps when small pox laden blankets decimated entire tribes and nations and genocided them off the face of the earth as a peoples. Today, even an ordinary plebeian is trivially able to call attention to their common bond of pious virtues, and trivially unravel their bullshit. Their Hegelian Dialectic is slipping....

Below are some empirical essays which unarguably demonstrate how the modern white man is still united in the same un-severable common bond, its la mission civilisatrice, even upon each other, irrespective of their separate creeds and occasional bouts of antagonistic power-plays among each other. They only compete amongst themselves, and the outclassed by the better trained simply run home to mommy, variously crying foul and grapes are sour.

The losing white man in this primacy contest often makes a great show of friendship to the 'untermensch' victims of the winning white man, employing the timeserving “enemy of my enemy is my friend” principle to open new backdoors back into the same contest. I suspect that the white man's burden intrinsically makes sharing the prize problematic among the various white man from differing creeds and races for very long, despite their common mission of unfettered primacy whenever they can get away with it.

This common mission statement used to be mistakenly called the law of the jungle – but it really isn't. In the jungle, when the primacy hierarchy, all the way to the top, has eaten its fill, each rests until the next mealtime. The strong weed out the weak yes, but only from wanting to have their daily meals, and the weakest not being able to do so for one reason or another. Never just for the sake of control, for full spectrum dominance, in the urge to enslave others. But for the arbiters of the white man's burden, there can be no point of satiation in their social Darwinianism. Such primacy can only culminate in full master-slave bondage, couched in modern day Newspeak for camouflage as world government. But then, the masters must turn upon each other because there really can be, only one master!

This is the Nihilist Order that is being pushed upon mankind today by the legatees of the same old white man's burden. I really can't tell these different strands of the white man apart – be they holy Zionist Jews in Palestine bringing us Western civilization on that front, or pious Christians bringing “Jesus” to Afghanistan just as they did to the Americas, and to the Indo subcontinent, or noble leftists and atheists posing as their common peacenik antagonists. They all look the same to me, even from Mt. Fuji:

“Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and solid
foundation that the strongest earthquake cannot move you, and so
tall that the greatest enterprises of common men seem insignificant
from your lofty perspective. With your mind as high as
Mt Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the
forces that shape events; not just the things happening near to
you.” -- Miyamoto Musashi -- Quoted in Political Ponerology

Here are some of my pertinent writings on the theme of white man's burden, in reverse chronological order:

*

 http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-john-kaminski-are-you-jewish.html
*

 http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/01/white-mans-burden-still-looks-white.html
*

 http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/12/my-confusion-pt5-kevinmacdonald-wmb.html
*

 http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/02/respto-johnkaminski-jewish-writers.html
*

 http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/02/white-anglo-saxon-race-obsession.html
*

 http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/cacheof-12281-in-defence-of-larry-david-by-gilad-atzmon-with-zahirs-comment-afp-nov162009.pdf

Judge for yourself – and if you learn to tell the difference, please inform this confused plebeian who is fast reaching the pitiable conclusion that almost all of the dissent in the West, especially that led by the white man, is bogus! The rare exceptions are not sufficient in influence to call it effective dissent, and they are generally the unknown ordinary men and women of conscience who nobody knows, and who aren't the typical opinion-makers.

What this further underscores is the empirical pragmatism which has always been true, that the Global East, and the Global South, the lowest in the pecking order of the 'untermensch', stand pretty much alone against the incessant, all encompassing onslaught of the hectoring hegemons of the Global North-West. This has been the unvarnished history of the past several hundred years, and just because there is internet today, and the information age, it is foolish to think that it is all about to miraculously change! These new age tools have been deftly adapted for the same agenda which were previously thrashed out on lonely typewriters.

Unless the 'untermensch' nations of the East indigenously come to our own common self-defense against these almost superhuman global forces arrayed against us, no one else will.

The only known defense for the weak, is to innately become strong. No people living on the begging bowl pleading for justice in charity, have ever got a fair hearing in the imperial courts of any ubermensch, white, black, brown or yellow, any place on earth.

This is a stark lesson to remember for the American and Western public as well. They are continually taught to look towards “leaders” and “experts” to show them the way at the expense of their own commonsense. Kept thoughtlessly occupied chasing the mirage of the 'American Dream', the 'white trash' of the Global North-West shall not escape the butcher's knife either. Their biggest Achilles heal today, is their loss of faith, and their greatest nemeses are those pitching Secular Humanism to them by reviling all religions.

And it is done with such finesse – if one were to judge Islam by the ubiquitous song of “Islamofascism” in the Western newsmedia and the Hollywood movies, Christianity by the child molesting priests proudly decked in their starched collars of piety, Judaism by the Judeofascist Talmudic cabal who today principally stand out as the most barbaric of peoples on planet earth, one would become naturally primed for a great new secular substitute for the New Age.

In my Response to Nihilists and Letter to Muslims, I examined the new color that Western society is being so methodically painted in with the delicate and sophisticated brush strokes of Secular Humanism. This ain't a matter to be digested within the 15-second attention span that Westerners are taught to parse headline news with. If there is any truth to the sociologists' statistic that less than 2% people actually think, 8% think they think, and 90% would not be caught dead thinking, all plebeians are gonna have to work really hard to comprehend the Hegelian mind-fcks we are being routinely dished to prime us for “voluntarily” accepting the New World Order. As far as the hectoring hegemons are concerned, the North Western 'white trash' only occupy a different pecking order from the 'untermensch' of the East and the South. The misery at least ends for the dead. The wretched of the earth must continue to live in full service to the masters, wherever they might be, until it is their turn to be served at the dinner table. As meal. And if the wretched can be kept in a happy-happy state while waiting for their turn, voluntarily acceding to what is happening to them, so much the better.

Zahir Ebrahim

Project Humanbeingsfirst.org



Source URL:  http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/02/white-mans-burden-uniformly-distributed.html

Source Mirror:  http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/white-mans-burden-uniformly-distributed-by-zahirebrahim/

Source PDF:  http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/white-mans-burden-uniformly-distributed-by-zahirebrahim-2.pdf

Footnotes

Part-1: My experiments in confusion – Part-1: How many Jews does it take to confuse me? Response to 'How many Rabbis does it take to create a Racist State?'

Part-2: My experiments in confusion - Part-2: The invisible House of Rothschild

Part-3: My experiments in confusion - Part-3: The Omnipotent Rothschilds

Part-4: How many Gentiles does it take to confuse me? Evidently, also only One! Part-4

Part-5: My experiments in confusion - Part-5: Letter to Prof. Kevin MacDonald

Part-6: The white man's burden still looks white in color - Zahir Ebrahim's Response to John Kaminski's “There are no good Jews”

Response to Nihilists:  http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/zahir-ebrahims-response-to-nihilists/

Letter to Muslims:  http://humanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/letter-to-muslims/



The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at  http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at  http://Humanbeingsfirst.org. Verbatim reproduction license at  http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright.

02/20/2011 13:00:05 5715



The White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed among Jews Christians and Atheists – how can one tell the difference? By Zahir Ebrahim