BNP exposed as liars - Scottish BNP leaflets full of lies
IHTF | 17.04.2011 13:34 | Anti-racism | World
The ever odious BNP stoop to a new low.Their Scottish elelction leaflets not only jumpon the anti-Islam bandwagon much favoured by far-right wankers like the EDL etc. but are also full of lies and have been exposed as such.
BNP Scottish elelction leaflets have been shown to be full of dangerous and divisive anti-Islamic lies.
The leaflets claim that there are more Muslims in Britain than Scottish people, quite clearly a lie but with Islamophobia on the rise this is not only irresponsible and dangerous but shows how the BNP, like their Nazi counterparts in 1930'sGermany, are more than happy to latch onto whatever scapegoat bandwagon they can in order to win votes.
The leaflet has been reported to the Electoral Commission.Can't wait to see Griffin try to squirm his way out of this one!
Further proof, if proof were needed of exactly how desperate the ever embattled BNP are becoming. After revelations of gollywog burning, terrorism, paedophilia and other nastiness among its members as well as the ongoing finaces debacle it surely cannot be long now before the odious scum of the BNP bite the dust for once and for all.
Full report here
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/politics/bnp-reported-over-scots-leaflets-1.1096736#
The leaflets claim that there are more Muslims in Britain than Scottish people, quite clearly a lie but with Islamophobia on the rise this is not only irresponsible and dangerous but shows how the BNP, like their Nazi counterparts in 1930'sGermany, are more than happy to latch onto whatever scapegoat bandwagon they can in order to win votes.
The leaflet has been reported to the Electoral Commission.Can't wait to see Griffin try to squirm his way out of this one!
Further proof, if proof were needed of exactly how desperate the ever embattled BNP are becoming. After revelations of gollywog burning, terrorism, paedophilia and other nastiness among its members as well as the ongoing finaces debacle it surely cannot be long now before the odious scum of the BNP bite the dust for once and for all.
Full report here
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/politics/bnp-reported-over-scots-leaflets-1.1096736#
IHTF
Comments
Hide 11 hidden comments or hide all comments
corporate repost - with rant
17.04.2011 18:33
anon
Some commenters are twats
17.04.2011 21:17
who desperately want to be moderators!
the fool
17.04.2011 23:31
Thank you, but i don't take kindly to being insulted. Calling me a twat is bang out of order mate - totally uncalled for.
For your information, corporate reposts are against the editorial guidelines, so unless you think they are "fascistic hierarchal nonsense", then keep your mouth shut about things that you don't understand.
anon
Hahaha
18.04.2011 08:31
I know the editorial guidelines and I also know that there are moderators here to enforce them, (who are also well aware of the guidelines), so why do you feel the need to chime in? If you want to be a mod so bad then why not sign and become one? There's enough censorship on this site already, without clowns like you sounding off!
You're offended? What a shame! maybe if you grew a spine then you might not be offended by such common parlance, but then you seem to be a keyboard warrior so maybe a few letters on a screen from an unknown person can affect you so badly...but then that's just limp isn't it really? Anyway, cry yourself a river because nobody cares!
Still laughing
I don't read the Scottish Herald
18.04.2011 08:58
Crazy Barry
Hmmmm
18.04.2011 10:44
Describing the added text a "rant"?
Do I smell the fash a work here?
I may be wrong but would your average Indymedia reader have called for the post to be withdrawn merely because it links to a newspaper and call the accompanying text a "rant?"
I think not.
The BNP have been caught lying to the elctorate by way of encouraging Nazi-style scapegoating - of Muslims instead of Jews - and now someone called "anon" wants the post taken down because it links to a newspaper. Have these revelations hurt the BNP that badly?
If that is the case then lets get them out there and into the public eye - see if we can't finish these scumbags off once and for all!
IHTF
@IHTF
18.04.2011 11:37
Often the mods bend to their will, and this has encouraged the trolls no end, but fortunately there'll be a new collective launched next month with a different, (less repressive), philosophy and hopefully the clowns who scream and shout like "anon" will be ignored.
Obviously there's questions of why such people would make these demands, but I doubt "anon" is linked to the BNP...even though that makes their behaviour even more bizarre, but I've always assumed it's a case of small people and small minds!
IM UK Reader
guidelines
18.04.2011 22:29
Still laughing's comments should be removed because:
Guidelines quote:
"Personal attack: Articles and/or comments that contain abusive language against other activists or site users. Please make your point without resorting to personal abuse."
Its not a case of whether someone has a thick skin or not. I could call someone a "nigger" in a comment and complain about how they should have a thick skin and take it like a man. However, that has nothing to do with it.... its breaking the racist guidelines and therefore should be removed in the same way that a personal attack should.
"Personal attack: Articles and/or comments that contain abusive language against other activists or site users. Please make your point without resorting to personal abuse."
Calling someone a twat is "abusive". Please make your point without resorting to personal abuse.
anon
Is that you Harrington?
19.04.2011 16:55
not anon
well at least that is clear
20.04.2011 21:14
1. The guidelines mean shit. They should be deleted since they don't have to be followed.
2. It is acceptable to be abusive to other commenters
3. People are not to be treated equally. Who they are depends on what they are allowed to say on indymedia. (i'm not paul whatever his name is - chopper).
4. btw.... who put you in charge? Do you have the authority to dictate 1, 2 and 3 ?
anon
They're guidelines
20.04.2011 21:53
stupid!
Hide 11 hidden comments or hide all comments