Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Response to Essex SWSS failure to denounce sexism

Spectre | 27.01.2013 17:28 | Gender | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements

This is a response to the Essex SWSS statement released on Januray 25th concerning recent allegations of rape within the SWP. A group of students from the University of Essex were wholly unsatisfied with the statement for its failure to engage with serious allegations of sexism.

Note: this statement was written collectively by several people involved in the original petition requesting a public statement. We do not claim to speak for everyone who signed that petition.

A few weeks ago, details were leaked about a case where a young female member of the Socialist Workers Party came forward accusing a senior party member (and former National Secretary) of sexual assault and rape. She decided, as was perfectly within her rights, not to go to the police with this and instead trusted the party to deal with it internally. However, they totally failed to do so. The party put together a committee made up almost entirely of friends and colleagues of the accused and proceeded to question the young woman’s drinking habits and previous relationships - key parts in the culture of victim blaming and misogyny that a party that claims to stand for women’s equality must surely be against. In the days that followed, party members who spoke up about what was going on were ‘accused’ of being feminists (as if this were an insult!) and workers in the party’s central office were allegedly told not to mention the case again. Some party members were moved around the country, some left the party altogether. The party had sexual abuse at it’s very centre pointed out to it, failed to deal with in a way in keeping with its own principles, and then tried to cover it up. For over two weeks, the Essex SWSS group said nothing about the matter - even after a petition calling for a public statement condemning sexism and sexual violence from them gathered over 90 signatures.

A statement did finally appear on January 25th (days after the deadline set out by the ignored petition), alongside statements from many other SWSS groups from around the country. Whilst (almost) all the others managed to hit the nail on the head and condemn what happened in the first few lines (in fact Leeds, LSE, Brighton, Sussex, Manchester and the FE SWSS groups all open with this), our own local SWSS group managed to produce a convoluted 590 words of whitewash which totally avoided the issue at hand. Instead of condemning sexism, rape or sexual harassment, rape apology and victim blaming (none of which are event mentioned in the statement) like their comrades, the Essex SWSS statement gives us an irrelevant recap of their party conference. To anyone unaware of the issues, it is totally meaningless - the only mention of the alleged rape, the botched handling of it and the harassment of party members that resulted is a brief mention that “[the] Disputes Committee failed the comrade at the centre of the case”. No more is said and the victim's suffering fails to be acknowledged. Most of the statement is given over to Essex SWSS washing their hands of any guilt (the suggestion that since the Essex SWSS delegates didn’t vote for the report, they are free of responsibility flies in the face of any sense of accountability) and then regretting the fact that the lack of leadership from the Central Committee means they can’t move forward with their “perspective for students in which SWSS comrades [are] a revolutionary current on campus...” (whatever that means). While other SWSS statements condemn a “betrayal of our politics on women’s liberation” (LSE), take the opportunity to "re-affirm [a] commitment to fighting sexism” (Leeds) and say that what has happened in the party in terms of feminism is “indefensible” (Queen Mary) the only mention of women’s liberation anywhere in the Essex statement is of a “strong theoretical tradition”. One that it seems to the Essex SWSS is purely theoretical since they’ve done nothing here to defend it in practice. To them, the main concern is that the party has been weakened.

It wouldn’t have been hard to produce a statement that would have satisfied everyone who put their name to the petition last week. Plenty of SWSS groups managed it, but Essex we feel has first ignored us and then failed us. Perhaps answering fellow students' concerns simply wasn’t important? Or perhaps voicing dissent and standing up for women’s rights just isn’t as valuable as keeping favour with the central committee that has tried to cover up allegations of rape? Everything the statement should have said can be summed up in five bullet points
• Denounce rape, sexism, rape apology, victim blaming.
• Strongly condemn the party’s handling of this case and in general its treatment of feminism.
• An apology: not taking personal responsibility, but an apology as part of a collectivity
• A statement from the women’s officer (who is also president of Essex SWSS), since she has a responsibility towards all women on campus to actively engage in the fight against sexism.
• Recognition of concerns of Essex students, for example through an acknowledgement of the petition

Essex SWSS had a chance to make things right. The petition - which was signed by current and former students, society committees, staff members and activists - was sent to all members of the SWSS committee and several personal conversations with members raised the same concerns. Many of us have now lost all confidence in SWSS Essex to seriously deal with issues of sexism. We feel that having a women’s officer who is part of a group that fails to stand up for women and who made no comment despite her official position when female students raised the issue is not acceptable. Moves for her resignation or for a vote of no confidence in the women’s officer are now being made. While we do not want this to become personal or to let the let the issue here be abused by anyone to score cheap political shots against the SWP or the left in general (especially not by members of political groups that have never really stood up for women’s rights in the past), there is a conflict of interest here - supporting a group that fails to condemn sexism or supporting women’s liberation. We are also aware that while signatories of the petition for a public statement have been collectively ignored, some individual signatories have been contacted in relation with the Essex SWSS statement and have simultaneously been offered support in the upcoming Student Union elections, presumably as a political bribe to consider the issue resolved and to stop pursuing it. We wholly reject this tactic as underhanded and as refusing to deal with this situation in a transparent way.

This action is not an ‘attack’ on the Sabbatical officers of the SU or an attempt to undermine the SU and the upcoming election in general. It only concerns the SWP and SWSS on our campus. The failure of Essex SWSS to condemn rape apology and sexism and to stand up for women’s rights means we now feel it necessary to organise against them as we would any group who did the same.
(The Essex SWSS statement and others are available here:  http://tinyurl.com/b35k97k)

Spectre

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Boring — Yawner
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech