Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act ( http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/schedule/7) makes it an imprisonable offence in the UK not to provide information to the police if stopped at a port or airport and there is no right to representation by a
lawyer. The act may only be used to ask questions with the aim of establishing whether a person is involved in terrorism or the preparation of acts of terrorism. However, two researchers from UK based research group Corporate Watch were stopped under the act on their return from Palestine ( http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=4716) and questioned about their journalistic work, the work of the international solidarity movement and the international movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions.
The Corporate Watch researchers were also questioned about their involvement with Smash EDO (www.smashedo.org.uk), a UK based anti arms trade campaign. Woodhead has also been involved in the campaign. He was part of a group of activists who broke into the Brighton factory of EDO-MBM Technology and, after barricading themselves inside, proceeded to damage around £200,000 worth of manufacturing equipment. Following a month-long trial in summer 2010, they were cleared of charges of criminal damage after satisfying the jury that they had lawful excuse to cause the damage because they were acting to prevent war crimes being carried out with equipment manufactured by the company in the December 2008 to January 2009 offensive in the Gaza Strip.
Woodhead, in a statement given from Givon detention centre in Ramla, said that he would risk imprisonment by refusing to give information to the police if they attempt to misuse the act. He plans to say: "I have reasonable grounds to believe you only want to interrogate me about my involvement in political movements such as International Solidarity Movement and various campaigns against the arms trade. None of these movements has any credible links to terrorism. I therefore believe the use of Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 is a gross misuse of police powers. I intend now to hold my silence in protest against such abuse of power."