9-11 truth activists deliver letter to Guardian newspaper
Mockingbird | 24.11.2013 18:39 | Terror War
Inspired by the ReThink9-11 campaign which has put a massive billboard opposite the New York Times HQ, 9-11 Truth activists in London decided to deliver a letter of their own to the UK's own liberal voice, the Guardian newspaper.
Banner
On 22 November, a group of 9-11 truth activists delivered a letter to the Guardian questioning their coverage of the attacks of 9-11 2001.
The Guardian has achieved a reputation as an outlet for Whistleblowers, and has been praised (and condemned) for bringing information provided by Chelsea (Bradley) Manning and Edward Snowden to public attention.
However when security service insiders and expert witnesses blow the whistle on the official 9-11 story, their testimony is either downplayed or ignored. One example is Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator who described the cover-up as follows,
‘What occurred with the 911 related investigation – be it the FBI, or the Department of Defense, or the Department of State, or the CIA or the Pentagon – they choose to basically publicize the deal at the hijacker level – and completely went about covering up certain entities that they had DIRECT evidence, DOCUMENTED evidence of the support networks – be it the financial support networks, or communications, or obtaining visas – they have not touched those individuals. Those individuals are still roaming free! Today!’
The activists also handed out flyers to Guardian staff and answered questions about our campaign. This activity was carried out in support of the ReThink9-11 campaign which sent a letter to the NYT this month challenging their coverage of 9-11.
More information on their campaign is at the link below
http://rethink911.org/news/open-letter-to-the-new-york-times/
The corporate media have betrayed the public by assisting the US government in promoting the findings of a sham inquiry (the 9-11 Commission) which was denounced even by its chairman as ‘set up to fail’. The official story of the 9-11 attacks, which is largely based on the findings of this enquiry, is a totally unsuitable foundation on which to base a foreign policy and domestic security agenda.
The Jimmy Savile scandal showed that a single act of bravery by a media professional can destroy a conspiracy of silence. We call on media professionals to start asking questions about the 9-11 attacks. They could start by asking how office fires in a fire-proofed, steel-frame skyscraper (building 7) managed to achieve this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mamvq7LWqRU&feature=youtu.be
The Guardian has achieved a reputation as an outlet for Whistleblowers, and has been praised (and condemned) for bringing information provided by Chelsea (Bradley) Manning and Edward Snowden to public attention.
However when security service insiders and expert witnesses blow the whistle on the official 9-11 story, their testimony is either downplayed or ignored. One example is Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator who described the cover-up as follows,
‘What occurred with the 911 related investigation – be it the FBI, or the Department of Defense, or the Department of State, or the CIA or the Pentagon – they choose to basically publicize the deal at the hijacker level – and completely went about covering up certain entities that they had DIRECT evidence, DOCUMENTED evidence of the support networks – be it the financial support networks, or communications, or obtaining visas – they have not touched those individuals. Those individuals are still roaming free! Today!’
The activists also handed out flyers to Guardian staff and answered questions about our campaign. This activity was carried out in support of the ReThink9-11 campaign which sent a letter to the NYT this month challenging their coverage of 9-11.
More information on their campaign is at the link below
http://rethink911.org/news/open-letter-to-the-new-york-times/ The corporate media have betrayed the public by assisting the US government in promoting the findings of a sham inquiry (the 9-11 Commission) which was denounced even by its chairman as ‘set up to fail’. The official story of the 9-11 attacks, which is largely based on the findings of this enquiry, is a totally unsuitable foundation on which to base a foreign policy and domestic security agenda.
The Jimmy Savile scandal showed that a single act of bravery by a media professional can destroy a conspiracy of silence. We call on media professionals to start asking questions about the 9-11 attacks. They could start by asking how office fires in a fire-proofed, steel-frame skyscraper (building 7) managed to achieve this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mamvq7LWqRU&feature=youtu.be
Mockingbird
Comments
Display the following 7 comments