Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Government Waste Policy Is Half-Baked

Rufus Hirsch | 17.11.2014 11:42 | Climate Chaos | Ecology | Energy Crisis

The Waste Hierarchy needs enforcement or incentivisation if it’s ever really going to make a difference. Rufus Hirsch, from London-based Clearance Solutions ( http://www.clearancesolutionsltd.co.uk/house-clearance/), talks about government policy surrounding The Waste Hierarchy, and the need for changing perspectives around its enforcement.

In my experience, the regulations ( http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2011/9780111506462/contents) surrounding adherence to the Waste Hierarchy are regarded as little more than a box ticking exercise.

Before I get into why this is, I should clarify that I don’t mean this as a criticism of the regulations as such. The regulations are sound; a solid first step in reducing Britain’s over dependence on landfill, but without enforcement, they lack teeth.

As Dominic Hogg points out in this earlier article ( http://www.edie.net/library/view_article.asp?id=6292&title=The+waste+hierarchy%3A+it%27s+your+duty+), many companies are “stating in waste transfer notes that they have fulfilled a duty which they are obviously not fulfilling”.

I agree with Hogg’s conclusions that a campaign aimed at greater clarification of a business’ duties to adhere to the Waste Hierarchy is necessary, though in my view, more needs to be done.

Enforcement Of The Waste Hierarchy Amounts To Little More Than A Promise, And Is Largely Ignored

Officially, a company is required to “take all such measures as are reasonable in the circumstances” to apply the Waste Hierarchy.

Waste must be prevented where possible either through reduction or reuse, and unavoidable waste should be preferentially recycled, or failing that, utilised as fuel for a waste-to-energy programme. Only once these options have been exhausted can disposal options be considered.

Failure to comply with these regulations can lead to prosecution and a fine.

In practice, however, these regulations have had little effect on how most businesses handle their waste.

All a company must do is obtain a waste transfer notice (whilst disposing of their rubbish as inefficiently as before) on which they state that they’ve done everything in their power to adhere to the Waste Hierarchy.

The regulations aren’t enforced by anything other than an honour system, so any dishonesty about the extent to which a business has fulfilled its duty is going to go unpunished.

Besides which, the language of the regulations is largely malleable. The “reasonable measures” required of companies is open to interpretation, and there’s an inherent problem in trying to police how hard people have tried.

As highlighted by the CBI in a 2011 report ( http://www.cbi.org.uk/media/1057920/cbi_-_making_ends_meet.pdf), “waste policy… does not always enable the best environmental and economic outcome”, arguing that “an independent retailer will pay for waste disposal via business rates, with little incentive to pay additional costs to use recycle facilities”.

It goes on to point out that businesses that don’t produce particularly large amounts of recyclable materials at once would need to stockpile their recyclable waste for quite a period of time before recycling becomes the more economically viable route.

It’s not particularly difficult to argue that, for a profit-driven business, anything other than the most immediately cheap and convenient option goes beyond what constitutes “reasonable”.

Consequently, if a business doesn’t want to adhere to the Waste Hierarchy, there are plenty of ways in which it can argue that it doesn’t have to. Signing a waste transfer notice is, for many, the start and end of their efforts to comply with regulations.

But Forcing People To Obey The Regulations Is Practically Impossible; Incentives Will Have A Real Impact

Having said all this, I believe that tougher enforcement of the regulations is entirely the wrong approach.

The costly practice of funding inspections and ecological audits of companies would be a nanny-state nightmare. In all likelihood, policing would prove ineffective, and the efforts companies would go to in order to get around the regulations would only foster resentment and do little to encourage good waste management.

Even if the regulations were policed in such a way as to have limited success, enforcement of a regulation only ever encourages companies to do the bare minimum. And because of the vastly different nature of businesses, in the interest of fairness it is likely that this minimum would have to be set rather low.

For those companies that would potentially go the extra mile with a little encouragement, enforcement offers nothing.

This is why a good level of adherence to the Waste Hierarchy requires incentives, and a unified approach to incentives at that.

Voluntary schemes aimed at incentivising good waste management have a proven track record. In the report, the CBI highlights the Courtauld Commitment and the Ashdown Agreement as examples of highly successful government led, voluntary schemes.

There simply needs to be more of this happening, and for a wider variety of businesses. If there were a universal incentive to stick closer to the Waste Hierarchy, perhaps a system by which a company could earn carbon credits proportional to the emissions they’ve prevented by improving their waste management, then this would cause an immediate shift in the perception of the waste regulations. What were previously tedious fragments of bureaucracy would become targets that companies were keen to hit.

Rufus Hirsch
- e-mail: info@clearance-solutions.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.clearancesolutionsltd.co.uk/house-clearance/

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech