Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

My view on the `Honours System`

Paul O'Hanlon | 02.01.2015 01:48 | Anti-militarism | Anti-racism | Repression | London | World

`The UK Honours system recognises people of outstanding merit and those who have committed themselves to service to the nation. It's been around for centuries, but it was a closed system for many years. Only since 1993 has everybody been free to nominate. ` Thus mass murderers oops International Statesmen like Henry Kissinger are likely to receive an award as he did in 1995.
















The New Year’s Honours List was announced yesterday and I am huffed at not receiving a K. Seriously though, some very dubious characters have received very high awards such as monsters like former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger did in 1995 when he was made an honorary Knight Commander.



Stephen Glover writes in the Daily Mail of Thursday January 1st 2015:


`How CAN we honour Blair's key aide who was so complicit in secretly committing Britain to war in Iraq? Sir David Manning has been made a Knight Commander of the Royal Victorian Order in the New Year Honours List.

How many people in this country have ever heard of the retired diplomat Sir David Manning? One in a hundred? No, it must be fewer than that. One in a thousand would be closer to the mark.

And yet this unknown person was Tony Blair’s key foreign policy adviser in the run-up to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. He stands accused of helping Blair to make a secret pact with George W. Bush in June 2002 to wage war against Saddam Hussein. `

Read more:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2893131/STEPHEN-GLOVER-honour-Blair-s-key-aid-complicit-secretly-committing-Britain-war-Iraq.html#ixzz3Nc1p2cKJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook




My view on the `Honours System`


This `honours` system should really be called the `dishonours` system. Monsters like former Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu the so-called `The Genius of the Carpathians` became a Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath (GCB) in 1978 because although a communist he offered some opposition to the then Soviet Union.


The Americans liked him because Ceaușescu's Romania was the only Eastern Bloc country that retained diplomatic relations with Israel and did not sever diplomatic relations after Israel's pre-emptive strike against Egypt at the start of the Six-Day War in 1967. France granted Ceaușescu the Legion of Honour while he received the Danish Order of the Elephant from Denmark.



American `Human Rights` President Jimmy Carter welcomed Ceausescu to Washington in April 1978 with the following fawning salutation:


PRESIDENT CARTER. This morning the people of the United States are honored by having as our guest a great leader of a great country. President Ceausescu comes here from Romania with his wife, Elena, and it is a great personal pleasure for me on behalf of our country to welcome them.

This is the fourth visit by President Ceausescu to the United States, and my predecessors have honored themselves by visiting the nation of Romania.
It's accurate to say that in the last 10 years or more, the friendly relationships between the United States and Romania have increased and improved rapidly to the satisfaction and to the benefit of our people.

Trade between our two countries in the last 10 years has been multiplied 10 times over. And because of the rapidly improving relations that still exist, we expect the volume of trade to more than double in the next 3 years.
It's also of great benefit to me as President to have a chance to consult with a national and an international leader like our guest today.

Their influence as Romanian leaders throughout the international world is exceptional. Because of the strong commitments of the President and the independence of the people, Romania has been able to serve as a bridge among nations with highly divergent views and interests and among leaders who would find it difficult under some circumstances to negotiate directly with each other.

One recent notable achievement of President Ceausescu was to be instrumental in arranging the historic visit of President Sadat of Egypt to the capital of Israel in Jerusalem. Both of those countries have found in Romania an avenue of communication and understanding that's been very valuable to them, to the Middle East, and to world peace.

There are differences, obviously, between the United States and Romania, in our political system and also in our military alliances. But the factors which bind us together are much more profound and of much greater benefit to our countries. We share common beliefs. We believe in strong national sovereignty. We believe in preserving the independence of our nations and also of our people. We believe in the importance of honoring territorial integrity throughout the world.

We believe in equality among nations in bilateral dealings, one with another, and also in international councils. We believe in the right of every country to be free from interference in its own internal affairs by another country. And we believe that world peace can come—which we both devoutly hope to see—through mutual respect, even among those who have some differences between us.

Our goals are also the same, to have a just system of economics and politics, to let the people of the world share in growth, in peace, in personal freedom, and in the benefits to be derived from the proper utilization of natural resources.

We believe in enhancing human rights. We believe that we should enhance, as independent nations, the freedom of our own people. And Romania has been instrumental in pursuing the goals of the Helsinki conference, in particular, building the mutual confidence factors that can let the nations of Eastern Europe and the nations of Western Europe understand one another better and build up legitimate trust through that understanding.


We also believe in a common goal-which President Ceausescu has endorsed forcefully and publicly—in the principle of world disarmament, based on mutually beneficial agreements and based on an enhanced prospect for peace.
Mr. President, Mrs. Ceausescu, on behalf of the American people, I want to extend my expression of honor that you are here and the warmest welcome to the United States. Thank you very much.




PRESIDENT CEAUSESCU. Mr. President, esteemed Mrs. Carter:
It is with particular pleasure that myself, my wife, and the associates accompanying me are visiting again the United States at the kind invitation extended by you, Mr. President, and by Mrs. Carter.

I should like to begin by addressing to you and to the people of America the warmest greetings of the people of Romania, who are most desirous to entertain and develop friendly relations and cooperation with the great people of the United States.

Our visit here takes place at a time when the relations between Romania and the United States have seen continuous progress. Indeed, in the last 10 years, there was a significant growth in our economic exchanges, which have increased almost 10 times over, as well as in our cooperation in the field of science, culture, and in the exchange of citizens between our two countries.


I do hope that in the course of our talks these days we shall be able to identify new opportunities, so that in the forthcoming years we shall make even more significant progress in our relationship, in full accord with the basic interests of our two nations and with the interests of cooperation and peace throughout the world.


It is true, as you mentioned, sir, that our two countries have different social systems. But I believe that in the world of today this should not be an obstacle in the way of more active cooperation in all fields, based on mutual respect of each country's independence and sovereignty, renunciation of the use or threat of force, and mutually advantageous cooperation.


I would like to mention with satisfaction, as well, that it is precisely on that basis that the relations between Romania and the United States have been established and are now developing.

So, Mr. President, I think we can be satisfied with the present level of the relations between our two countries. As for the state of international affairs, unfortunately we are still facing events which are both complex and complicated.


The world is now confronted with severe economic problems. In many areas of the world there are still conflicts, and threatening clouds are menacing the peace of the world with very severe consequences.

In the face of this situation, it is now necessary for all countries, irrespective of their size, of their military might, of their social system, to take action and to uphold the principles of peaceful coexistence in order to build a kind of cooperation based on equal rights and mutual respect, and to ensure to each nation the right to develop in freedom without any outside interference.

As participants and signatories of the Helsinki documents on European security, both Romania and the United States are working for the implementation of those documents, which we both see as one whole in the economic, cultural, scientific, humanitarian fields, as well as in the field of military disengagement.

Unfortunately, at Belgrade, no significant progress was made. That is why we believe it necessary now that before our next meeting in Madrid, new efforts should be made in order to meet the peoples' aspiration for peace and cooperation.

It is also true that no effort should be spared in order to bring peace to the Middle East, leading to the withdrawal of Israel from the territories occupied as a result of 1967 war, the settlement of the Palestinian question, including the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, and by guaranteeing the independence, sovereignty, and integrity of all the states in the area, which should establish their relations on the principles of good neighborly relations and cooperation.

We would like to work together closely on such matters as disarmament. We are hopeful that at the forthcoming Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly, practical results will be worked out, leading to actual disarmament and, in particular, nuclear disarmament, enabling us thus to build a world of cooperation and peace for all.

Although the United States is a developed country—I would say a highly developed country—and Romania is still a developing one, such problems as the elimination of underdevelopment and the establishment of a new international economic order are matters of equal concern for both our countries, because without ensuring new relations, new democratic relations based on equal rights and mutual advantage, we shall not be able to eliminate underdevelopment and to ensure economic stability and progress to the world.

It is also true that there are many problems on which our two countries can well work together, and with good results, too. And I hope that our talks will further strengthen the basis for our mutual cooperation, aimed at meeting their common interests of our two nations and also meeting the aim of a better world, a world with more justice, in which each and every people should be able to dedicate their efforts to their happiness, to their well-being, to their freedom.


It is my conviction that all this will come true. And once again, I should like to express my wish to see good cooperation develop between our two nations and our wish to the friendly people of America every success and peace.


Ugh!!! (My comment)
________________________________________

Another monster who is sadly still living and influential at 91 is former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. In 1995, Kissinger was made an honorary Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire at the recommendation of Douglas Turd oops I mean Douglas Hurd who in 1995 was Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Foreign Secretary) in the John Major administration.


Of course the honour for which Henry (who journalist Danny Schechter calls `the odious Dr K`) is most renowned is the Nobel Peace prize which he received in 1973 for his efforts to bring `peace` to Vietnam. These magnificent efforts included the slaughter of around 6 million people in South East Asia, mainly in Vietnam but also in Laos and notably Cambodia. The saturation bombing of Cambodia on which the equivalent of around 5 Hiroshima atomic blasts were dropped led to the destruction of Phnom Penh and this abetted the rise of the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot which in turn led to the notorious killing fields.


When asked to comment on Kissinger’s award of the Nobel Peace Prize having killed so many people American singer song-writer and satirist Tom Lehrer merely said “Satire is now obsolete.”


I feel a little miffed about not getting a gong. Perhaps if I went out and killed maybe 6 million people like Henry Kissinger I could expect a knighthood, a Nobel Peace Prize, massive after dinner speaking fees and get to date all those glamorous women that Henry used to be seen with in the 1960’s, 1970’s and even 1980’s – Jill St John, Shirley MacLaine, Dolly Parton, Elizabeth Taylor, Princess Diana etc. etc.


Even at 91 Henry Kissinger's advice is much sought after and he attended the 2014 Bilderberg meeting of the rich and powerful in Copenhagen. He had the gall to advise Scots to vote `No` to Independence in the Scottish Referendum of September 2014.


Henry Kissinger on the Scottish Referendum:
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2014/09/518187.html



It’s a wicked world and who was it that said that cheats never prosper?

Paul O'Hanlon
- e-mail: o_hanlon@hotmail.com

Comments

Hide 8 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

My view on Paul O'Hanlon

02.01.2015 18:08

You write massive self indulgent verbal spew that nobody can be arsed to read.

Piss off and start your own blog so we are spared this regular crap.

Hanlon O'Paul


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

My view on Paul O'Hanlon

02.01.2015 18:55

+1

Agreeing


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Isn't that a little harsh?

02.01.2015 19:33

Dear `O’Hanlon Paul` and `Agreeing`

Why do you feel the need to hide behind pseudonyms? Why can’t you be open about your identity? I’m sorry that you don’t like my articles and you have a perfect right to disagree with what I say. However isn’t Indymedia all about citizen’s journalism and freedom of speech? Might I suggest you start contributing articles to the Indymedia website yourselves or is it yourself as I suspect you may be the same person.

What are your views on the New Year’s Honours List? How about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? How about the continuing disgrace of the illegal Guantanamo detention camp?

I’d be interested in anything you have to say about these or other matters.

By the way was +1 meant to be a compliment?

Whatever, Best wishes for the New Year,

Regards, Paul O’Hanlon

Paul O'Hanlon
mail e-mail: o_hanlon@hotmail.com


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

My comment stands

02.01.2015 21:16

Start your own blog, stop spamming Indymedia

Hanlon O'Paul


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

My article stands

03.01.2015 07:45

Dear Hanlon O’Paul

“You write massive self-indulgent verbal spew that nobody can be arsed to read.”

How do you know nobody reads my articles? – well, you seem to read them for one. Can I ask who you are exactly? I’m afraid I’m going to have to accuse you of cowardice as you won’t reveal your true identity.

Do you work for the security agency MI5 for example?

In any case why do you feel the need to use such offensive language?

Why not write in to one of Rupert Murdoch’s many periodicals and ask why his papers publish such tosh. Tripe such as the lies about Hillsborough, the lies about the Birmingham Six who were innocent but according to the Sun were guilty, the lies about the Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq which never existed etc. etc.

Indymedia needs more articles and indeed more writers so I will continue to write them and I just wish more would contribute pieces of alternative journalism to the website that Indymedia was specifically designed for.

As I suggested before why not write some articles yourself. By the way do you have problems with any other Indymedia writers or just me?

Best wishes for 2015 to you and all Indymedia writers and readers and even trolls whoever you are,

Paul O’Hanlon

Paul O'Hanlon
mail e-mail: o_hanlon@hotmail.com


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Save us from your views.

03.01.2015 07:57

O for Earth's sake grow up !

Go read what you have written, do you really think that crap is relevant or interesting to Indymedia readers ?

This is a NEWSWIRE not a forum for your pretentious diatribes.

Piss off and save us from even having to scroll past it.

Hanlon O'Paul


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

What about freedom of speech Mr O'Paul?

03.01.2015 10:04

Dear Mr Hanlon O’Paul

You write dismissively:

“O for Earth's sake grow up!”

I am afraid I don’t know what you mean Mr O’Paul. I ask again why will you not reveal your true identity? What exactly is wrong with my articles? Are they factually incorrect? Surely the most recent piece I wrote about the New Year’s Honours list is relevant as it is also current news.

You write this is a NEWSWIRE and “Save us from your views.” Am I not entitled to my views? Are my articles not newsworthy? For example I plan to write an article about the ongoing Julian Assange story. He receives little coverage in the mainstream media apart from perhaps Russia Today. Another topic I think is newsworthy is the Russell Tribunal on Palestine which does not have a single mention on the BBC website.

From the Russell Tribunal website:

`A few weeks ago, members of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine, outraged by Israel’s terrible assault on Gaza and its population, decided to start working on an extraordinary session of the Tribunal that will look into Israel’s Crimes (including War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity and the Crime of Genocide) during the still ongoing “Operation Protective Edge” as well as third States complicity.

During this session, that will take place in Brussels on 24th and 25th of September, our jury, so far composed of Michael Mansfield QC, John Dugard, Vandana Shiva, Christiane Hessel, Richard Falk, Ahdaf Soueif, Ken Loach, Paul Laverty, Roger Waters, Ronnie Kasrils, Radhia Nasraoui and Miguel Angel Estrella will listen to testimonies from Paul Behrens, Desmond Travers, David Sheen, Max Blumenthal, Eran Efrati, Mads Gilbert, Mohammed Abou-Arab, Mads Gilbert, Paul Mason, Martin Lejeune, Mohammed Omer, Raji Sourani, Ashraf Mashharawi, Ivan Karakashian, Agnes Bertrand and Michael Deas.`


I imagine you will not enjoy reading such an article so why not `change the channel` as former US Army spokesman Mark Kimmit used to say when people found the coverage of the 2003 attack on Iraq unpleasant to watch? Unfortunately the Iraqi people were unable to `change the channel` as they were under an occupation they could not remove and had no electricity after the Americans bombing destroyed it. To this day nearly 12 years after the `war` (in reality not a war but a series of massacres as it takes two armies for a war) the power has still not been fully restored.

Would I offend your delicate sensibilities by writing an article about the terrible damage inflicted on Iraq which was already reeling from brutal sanctions that killed maybe a million people?

Once again can I ask why you keep using offensive epithets like `p*** off``? What have I done to upset you?

Give me one good reason why I should stop writing my articles? What about freedom of speech?

I am not going to dignify this absurd forum with any more comments as I have other things to do, other articles to write which you are likely take exception to.

I believe in freedom of speech which you clearly do not. Why am I so important to you? There must be thousands of articles by hundreds of journalists in the mainstream media that you could complain about such the examples I have already given about the Birmingham Six, the non-existent WMD in Iraq and so on.

Please reveal your true identity as I have revealed mine and try to be a little less offensive and dismissive of what are sincerely held views.

For the last time, dear troll, Mr O'Paul,

Happy New Year!!


Paul O’Hanlon

Paul O'Hanlon
mail e-mail: o_hanlon@hotmail.com


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

"Paul O'Hanlon" = spam

05.01.2015 11:53

I'd be grateful if the mods could update the filters to pre-hide this poster who seems to be spamming the newswire on a weekly basis with his or her posts which are clearly not 'news' and seem to consist of some weird stream of thought better suited to a blog or private zine.

Thanks everyone, have a great 2015.

spamwatch


Hide 8 hidden comments or hide all comments

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech