Explosive, serious speech.

They serve photo in order to make analysis

I have read these observations on a forum
"I have observed the photo of double decker the bus in head to the 3ad, and I have not found traces of " tuxedo gun ", that is "reperti" that they have gone in high temperature for some moment.
As an example when it is spoken about I talk nonsense point-blank, a circumstance is indicated where the outbreak of the blow so is drawn near to burn the hair.
But the fanatical organizations have succeeded here to blow up the roof of the bus without signs of burns."


"I have noticed .
the sheets of the bus "were unglued" in block on the side but no sign of burns/outbreaks. nothing to that to see with the Israeli buses, as an example.

in effects he is unusual what. "


Of it I have spoken with an expert friend about I exploded to you and it has said to me, a lot in synthesis, that it could have been used not an explosive but a gas, - and however technical sophisticated complex would be one and - but has said to me that before making of the hypotheses it must see of the photos.
They have said that they would not have published to them, "in order not to dramatise", perhaps but the scope is an other.
Task that hand by hand photos will come some outside, even made with telefonini.
It can be made an operation of search and collection photo?