London Indymedia

Police 'Abused Power' by Barring Anti-War Protesters

repost | 15.01.2004 12:29 | Anti-militarism | Repression | London

Police 'Abused Power' by Barring Anti-War Protesters
 http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2412471
By Jan Colley, PA News

The police were guilty of an “abuse of power” in barring three coachloads of protesters from a demonstration against the war on Iraq, the High Court heard today.


Counsel for about 60 of the 120 passengers who were prevented from attending the vigil at RAF Fairford in March said that the action taken by Gloucestershire Police was unlawful.

Michael Fordham said: “We submit both by reference to well established common law and also by reference to human rights law, as it now is in domestic law from October 2000, that that police action was an abuse of power.

“We submit that the the police stepped well outside the legal parameters on their powers and that the action taken was unjustified.”

He told Lord Justice May and Mr Justice Harrison, sitting in London, that the three coaches from London were intercepted in a lay-by in Lechlade at 12.50pm, searched and items were seized.

At 2.15pm, the decision was taken to return the coaches to London non-stop under police escort because of the view taken about preventing violence by hard-core demonstrators.

Mr Fordham said that both the action of turning away and of forcible return were unlawful.

“This was a case of a preventative restraint, not because of anything that had happened but because of something that was said to be anticipated.”

He said that he did not accept that there would have been a breach of the peace on arrival at Fairford.

Nor did he accept that there were no steps which the police could have taken to consider the different passengers and to seek to differentiate between them.

He said that the operation at Fairford, which was used by American B-52 bombers, was the largest and most complex police operation ever undertaken by Gloucestershire Police.

“The day was very important to them and very important to those who wished to go to Fairford to exercise their rights of assembly and expression.”

The protesters were utterly opposed to the US-led military assault on Iraq and wished to exercise their deeply-held beliefs through peaceful protest.

Mr Fordham said that the police regarded their operation as a great success in achieving their strategic objectives of preventing violence and facilitating peaceful protest.

Gloucestershire Police, which are contesting the judicial review proceedings, argue that their officers were not only entitled to take the action they did – they were obliged to.

The case is expected to go into tomorrow with no immediate decision.

repost

Comments

Display the following 7 comments

  1. The Right To Protest Denied — Patrick
  2. Decision made four hours early — would-be protester
  3. more info on legal proceedings — rikki
  4. Police Evidence Confirms Our Suspicions — coach captive
  5. Police Intelligence + FIT — TIT
  6. No Differentiation Indeed. — Pete
  7. so you're saying... — fredrico

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

London Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

London IMC

Desktop

About | Contact
Mission Statement
Editorial Guidelines
Publish | Help

Search :