London Indymedia

SOCPA ban on cycle sound systems.

Doug. | 25.11.2006 05:12 | Culture | Repression | Technology | London

While cycling up Whitehall last night with Critical Mass, a cycle cop pulled up alongside and said I wasn't allowed to play my sound system in Whitehall. I asked if he was going to arrest me and he said no but I would be liable to arrest if I did it again.

I asked why motorist are allowed to play their sound systems but cyclists are not. He said my sounds were too loud, which I took to be an unintentional compliment, and he said the matter could be tested in court, which I took to be an intentional threat.

In the SOCPA Act, see below, it says a sound system can be operated solely for the entertainment of the driver or passenger of the vehicle, so presumably if I have my rear mounted speakers facing forward and respectfully ask the other massers not to listen to my 'entertainment' I should be OK on the next ride.

Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 2005 Chapter 15 - continued

137 Loudspeakers in designated area
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a loudspeaker shall not be operated, at any time or for any purpose, in a street in the designated area.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the operation of a loudspeaker-

(a) in case of emergency,

(b) for police, fire and rescue authority or ambulance purposes,

(c) by the Environment Agency, a water undertaker or a sewerage undertaker in the exercise of any of its functions,

(d) by a local authority within its area,

(e) for communicating with persons on a vessel for the purpose of directing the movement of that or any other vessel,

(f) if the loudspeaker forms part of a public telephone system,

(g) if the loudspeaker is in or fixed to a vehicle and subsection (3) applies,

(h) otherwise than on a highway, by persons employed in connection with a transport undertaking used by the public, but only if the loudspeaker is operated solely for making announcements to passengers or prospective passengers or to other persons so employed,

(i) in accordance with a consent granted by a local authority under Schedule 2 to the Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act 1993 (c. 40).
(3) This subsection applies if the loudspeaker referred to in subsection (2)(g)-

(a) is operated solely for the entertainment of or for communicating with the driver or a passenger of the vehicle (or, if the loudspeaker is or forms part of the horn or similar warning instrument of the vehicle, solely for giving warning to other traffic), and

(b) is so operated as not to give reasonable cause for annoyance to persons in the vicinity.
(4) A person who operates or permits the operation of a loudspeaker in contravention of subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and is liable on summary conviction to-

(a) a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, together with

(b) a further fine not exceeding £50 for each day on which the offence continues after the conviction.
(5) In this section-

"local authority" means a London borough council (and, in subsection (2)(d), the Greater London Authority),

"street" means a street within the meaning of section 48(1) of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991 (c. 22) which is for the time being open to the public,

"the designated area" means the area specified in an order under section 138,

"vessel" includes a hovercraft within the meaning of the Hovercraft Act 1968 (c. 59).
(6) In Schedule 2 to the Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act 1993 (consent to the operation of loudspeakers in streets or roads), in paragraph 1(1), at the end add "or of section 137(1) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005".

Doug.

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

designated area

25.11.2006 14:09

And was the place where this happened a designated area under sec.138 of SOCPA - if not then you could have good reason to tell this cop to get on their bike.

FATW


designated area

25.11.2006 16:22

whitehall is definitely all within the designated area

rikki


Designated area.

25.11.2006 16:43

Yes it was in the designated area, shortly after passing Downing Street and approaching Traflagar Square. My guess is that a local NIMBY had contacted the cycle police by radio.

Doug


SOCPA times...

25.11.2006 19:08

Hate to say this, but the ar movement has had this treatment for a year or more... if we all made an effort to communicate and discuss protest tactics in these new SOCPA times.

Things are only going to get worse im afraid, first they came for the ar movement.

AnimalLiberation


.

25.11.2006 23:00

Hate to say this AnimalLiberation but you and your grave robbing mob deserve everything you get.

Beat any human animal lately.

.


Animal/Human/Earth Liberation

26.11.2006 01:48

You can judge the effectiveness of your actions by the reaction of your enemy. The reaction of the state to any form of dissent being 1. to panic, 2. to use the media as a tool to demonise anyone that threatens their power 3. to use the media to spread fear and panic, 4. to increase surveillance of its citizens, 5. to create new laws almost every other week to try and crush dissent and freedom of speech etc etc etc

WE ARE WINNING AND IT SHOWS


B8580757


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

London Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

London IMC

Desktop

About | Contact
Mission Statement
Editorial Guidelines
Publish | Help

Search :