London Indymedia

Benetton stores targeted by global protests

Rana | 26.04.2014 13:48 | Globalisation | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements | London | World

Thursday 24th April marked the one year anniversary of the Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh, in which over 1000 people died, and thousands more were seriously injured. Benetton shops were closed across Europe by protesters demanding compensation for the victims.

Paris
Paris

London
London

Florence
Florence

Dublin
Dublin


This week saw the one year anniversary of the disastrous Rana Plaza factory collapse, in which 1,134 Bangladeshi workers died and thousands more were injured. The anniversary was marked globally, with the victims and their families and supporters blocking roads in Dhaka to demand compensation, and a surge of solidarity vigils, actions and rallies around the world. Many of the protests singled out Benetton, who have not contributed anything to the compensation fund.

Benetton shops were closed across Italy, England, Ireland, France and Turkey by campaigners demanding that they pay into the compensation fund for the victims and their families. Benetton's flagship store in London lost an entire day of trade as protesters locked themselves to the doors for ten hours. [ http://www.redpepper.org.uk/protest-tells-benetton-to-pay-up-for-rana-plaza-victims/] “We don't think that Benetton should be making a profit in London on the anniversary of the collapse of Rana Plaza.” said Martha Jones, one of the protesters. The London store manager initially claimed that the company had paid compensation, but later retracted this, saying that she had been lied to by her superiors. In Dublin campaigners also closed a Benetton shop with a number of protesters occupying the shop with placards demanding justice for the survivors and condemning Benetton's actions.

In Italy, the home of Benetton, multiple shops were targeted by flash mobs, including in Florence, Milan and Treviso. Similar actions were carried out in France and Turkey.

The call out for Europe-wide action came from the Clean Clothes Campaign. Ineke Zeldenrust of the CCC said that Benetton, and other firms who have not contributed to the fund “have killed twice. They neglected the safety of the the workers who supply them, and now they are abandoning the survivors and the families of those who lost their lives.” European MEPs added their voice to the protests with a letter calling on Benetton and other Europe-based corporations to “publicly contribute a significant amount to the Rana Plaza Donor’s Trust Fund, an amount that will be sufficient to ensure each and every family received the payments they are owed.” [ http://www.socialistworld.net/doc/6751]


Benetton was chosen as a target because they have not contributed any money to the compensation fund, and have remained completely silent on the disaster, other than to make excuses and deny responsibility. They initially denied using the factory, but when their labels were found in the wreckage they had to admit a connection. They then claimed that it was a one-time order, and that this meant they have no responsibility to the victims. [ http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/01/1206113/-Meet-the-retailers-that-won-t-help-victims-of-Bangladesh-factory-collapse] They are now arguing that they have contributed, by handing out some prosthetic limbs, providing 'skills training' and offering loans to those affected. These gestures are a long way from meaningful compensation.

Furthermore an Italian documentary uncovered evidence, only months after the Rana Plaza collapse, that Benetton was continuing to source clothes from factories with underage workers, locked gates and no fire escapes. Benetton claimed not to 'recognise' these factories. [ http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/south-asia/bangladesh-garment-workers-still-vulnerable/article5950981.ece]


Rana

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

What a great idea

26.04.2014 19:20

Of course the problem might be how to collect this money from all the consumers out there who chose to buy clothes manufactured under these conditions rather than paying more for clothing produced under conditions better for the workers. At least I assume that your clothes (like ours) have "origin" labels, that if you want you can buy clothes that carry your equivalent of the ILGWU label (union made).

The blood is just as much on your hands, friends, on all of our hands. It isn't SIMPLY the evil capitalist merchants who are the exploiters here.

MDN


Italian Documentary used secret camera to record Benetton managers in Bangladesh

26.04.2014 21:31

Please go here to read the press release of the Italian documentary which exposed the continuing malpractice in Benetton factories in Bangladesh

 http://bit.ly/presadiretta2014

Shafiur Rahman
mail e-mail: shafiur@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://srdocs.net


action in Berlin too

27.04.2014 11:53

Rana


Myth 1: Exploitation is the fault of consumers.

27.04.2014 12:04

Myth 1: Exploitation is the fault of consumers.

Reading most of the dialogue around Rana Plaza feels like being sat at a pantomime with everyone looking unawares in one direction whilst the evil villain creeps up behind them. Much of the media is acting as an echo-chamber for Governments who blame the weakest members of society to hide their own wrongdoings.

In the UK the wrong people are blamed for the economic crisis, the finger is pointed at asylum seekers and people on benefits rather than tax dodging corporations and the banking sector that caused the crisis. In fashion, fourteen year old Primark customers are blamed for the existence of sweatshops instead of the corporations that force such low wages onto people, and instead of capitalism – an economic system with exploitation and profit in its very DNA.

 http://www.counterfire.org/index.php/articles/opinion/17174-rana-plaza-it-is-not-consumers-who-have-blood-on-their-hands

kjn


I think both are to blame

27.04.2014 16:21

The companies could easily pay for decent working conditions, etc, out of their profits - prices of goods in shops shouldn't need to increase atall.
However, until they do that, they should be boycotted.

Rich


Try reading what I wrote and THINKING

28.04.2014 13:26

>

I was NOT saying that these corporations had no blame in the matter.

But I was saying that we consumers most certainly shared in that blame by OUR choices. BE HONEST! Do YOU look at the label of origin? Do YOU buy the lowest priced alternative regardless of the conditions under which it was produced? Are YOU willing to pay somewhat more, possibly a lot more, to have garments produced by workers whose pay is higher, whose working conditions are better, etc.

I'm saying that the blood is on all of our hands.

Yes of course, these companies could pay more out of their profits, out of theiri pockets, to improve the lot of these workers. But YOU could be paying more out of your pockets too. Of course I don't mean YOU as much as WE. I'm part of this too. But at least I am willing to face responsibility for the choices that I make.

MDN


crystal balls

07.05.2014 21:52


I notice that this article points the finger "in hindsight"

It would of been helpful if you lot had forewarned the company that the building was going to collapse BEFORE it happened. That way, they could of done something about it.

If you didn't know it was going collapse, then I guess you are as much to blame as this clothing company; because they probably didn't know it was going to collapse either!

mail me


Why not pressure the government of Bangladesh?

09.06.2014 18:38

I think that governments are best at setting-up access to justice, national insurance, or more universal benefts like secondary schools and hospitals that all-together tend to reduce poverty.

One obscure part of this which I don't really understand is how Bangladeshi factory ownership is proved and how factory inspectors and trades unions work, so I won't pretend to be an expert, but that's an obscure example of how laws and government can help people not be squashed.

Looking at comments in this thread...

I think that country of origin labels are important, so that people can look-out for clothes made in countries that are probably democratic welfare states, and feel good in them even if the clothes aren't quite the most rapidly-changing in style or cheapest or available closest to home. And...

I think the Bangladeshi government has got-off very lightly here. They are the ones diverting money from public services into export subsidy. They are the ones who ought to pass practical laws, at least, about factory inspections and make sure that the law works in practice. They are the ones who have negotiated tariff-free access to EU markets, allowing their citizens to sell in unfair competition next to producers who pay taxes towards a welfare state.

https://facebook.com/planB4fashion - John R
mail e-mail: brittaniabuckle@yahoo.co.uk
- Homepage: https://facebook.com/planB4fashion


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

London Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

London IMC

Desktop

About | Contact
Mission Statement
Editorial Guidelines
Publish | Help

Search :